|
Social
influence
It’s important
to remember at the outset that although psychological research
generally gets conformity a bad name without it Society would
not function. In the majority of real life situations
conformity is seen as good!
Informational
Social Influence (ISI)
This happens
when there is no obvious right answer so we look to others for
information in order to be right.
Examples of
Psychological research:
Jenness
(1932): ‘Beans.’
A basic
study in which Jenness gave a jar of beans to individuals and
got them to estimate the number of beans inside. He then
grouped the same participants together and got them to discuss
the contents. Later when they were separated and asked their
opinions Jenness found that the estimates had converged around a
central figure.

Conclusion:
when we are unsure of an answer we look to others for help
assuming that a majority figure will be more reliable.
Sherif (1935):
‘Autokinetic effect’
Participants
sit in a darkened room and stare at a pinpoint of light that
appears to move, (try it sometime). They are asked to estimate
the distance it moves. Since the movement is only apparent the
correct answer is it doesn’t, but Sherif’s participants were
obviously not aware of this. Again, when put in rooms with
others their guesses converge towards a group norm.
In a follow up
experiment Sherif started the participants in groups were they
agree on an approximate answer. When individuals are taken from
this group and do the experiment on their own they stick to the
answer agreed earlier.
Findings of
this sort of research
Clearly there
is conformity when people are unsure of the answer since group
norms emerge.
Evaluation
Both studies
are very artificial so lack ecological validity. Can we
generalise from this to real life situations?
|
Normative Social Influence
This happens
when we go along with the crowd because we want to be accepted
or liked or because we want to avoid embarrassment or being
ridiculed.
Real life
examples: smoking because others in your peer group smoke,
dressing like your friends in order to fit in or avoid bullying
Examples of
Psychological research
Asch (1951
etc.): ‘The lines’
Mind
Changers: Solomon Asch
Again, you are
all aware of the procedure. Briefly stated: participants are
deceived into taking part in a study on visual perception. They
are seated at a desk with others that they believe to be fellow
participants but who in reality are in league with the
researchers (stooges or confederates). Lines are presented on a
screen and participants simply have to say which line (out of 3
possibilities, is the same length as the target line). The
stooges get the right answer on the first two trials but then
start to make deliberate mistakes.
Conformity is
measured by counting the number of times the real participant
conforms when stooges give the wrong answer.
Findings
Overall
conformity rate was 37% (sometimes reported as 32%)This means
that participants conformed on 37% of all trials.
However,
within this there were substantial individual differences:
Nobody conformed on 100% of trials
13 out of the original 50 never conformed at all
Highest rate of conformity was a participant who conformed
on 11 out of 12 trials 75% conformed at least once.
Also mention
what Asch found in his variations:
|
Factor |
Description and conformity |
|
Size
of group |
One
stooge (3%), two stooges (14%), three stooges (32%).
Further increases in group size do not increase
conformity. With very large groups conformity actually
begins to fall! |
|
Supporter |
If one
of stooges also disagrees with others conformity drops
sharply |
|
Difficulty of task |
As
task becomes more difficult conformity increases |
|
Familiarity of task |
We are
less likely to conform when we are confident in our
ability, e.g. men are less likely to conform to
incorrectly named tools than they are to incorrectly
named kitchen utensils. Clearly research of the 1950s! |
Next page |